Peer review, a key process in evaluating physician performance, primarily aims to measure diagnostic accuracy. Accuracy can be measured in terms of interpretive agreement or managers can use peer ratings as part of a formal evaluation to give them a better idea of an employee's true strengths and weaknesses. This, in turn, can help managers develop a training and development program that can include the specific skills each employee needs to improve. Peer reviews can also help managers learn about the introduction. Peer review is a ubiquitous element of assuring and evaluating the quality of scientific research. It is a vital part of a research and development enterprise that invests US dollars around the world each year and produces more than millions of peer-reviewed research articles. As a governing institutional norm, according to Hackett and Chubin 2003, peer review is expected to be effective. recommend projects that would benefit the field and bring greater social benefit, offer advice to proponents. The peer review process is essential for assessing the quality of scientific work, suggesting corrections, and learning from the mistakes of other authors. The principles of peer review are based largely on professionalism, eloquence and a collegial attitude. As such, reviewing journal submissions is a privilege and responsibility for the “elite.” The debate over whether the peer review system is in crisis has been heated recently. Various alternative systems have been proposed to improve the system and make it sustainable. However, we lack sufficient evidence and data on these issues. Here, we used a previously developed agent-based scientific publishing model. The peer review process is the long-standing method by which research quality is ensured. On the one hand, it aims to assess the quality of a manuscript, the desired result being theoretical.