The peer review process serves the dual purposes of assisting editors with publication decisions and providing authors with constructive feedback 1 - 3 . Journals vary in their approach to peer review. Peer review is at the heart of science and academic life. Kearney amp Henly amp It is an established component of the publication process, professional practice and the academic reward system Lee et al. 2013. The process involves the verification or evaluation of scientific work by a group of experts in the same field. The Peer Review Model for Patients and Novice Reviewers is a series of steps designed to create a workflow for the major components of peer review. A structured workflow can help an evaluator organize their thoughts and create space to engage in critical thinking. The model is a starting point for anyone new to peer review, and it is. There is a lack of consensus on what peer review is and its purposes, practices, outcomes, and impact on the academic enterprise Tennant amp Ross-Hellauer, 2020. The term peer review was relatively unknown. Referee was the most commonly applied notion, used primarily in relation to manuscript evaluation, and the peer review process is an essential part of academic research and publication. It serves as a quality control mechanism to ensure that scientific articles meet rigorous standards of accuracy, validity and significance. For researchers, navigating the peer review process can be both intimidating and crucial to their professional growth. On this point then, the abolition of peer review is a net positive, as scientists will still be incentivized to share their work as soon as possible, but the delays associated with peer review before publication are deleted. 3.2. Distribution of time. The current system restricts how scientists can spend their time.